THE BIG PICTURE

Before I kick off creation, I want to come with me, and step out into the garden, to look closely at the spherical corporeal structures in the sky above us. Although in plain view, it seems that nobody has asked the important question of why all these different structures are arranged within each other like a chain of diminishing Russian stacking dolls.

OUR UNIVERSE is the largest of these observable structural systems, the largest Matryoshka doll, and we have no firm take on its size or mass.

SUPER CLUSTERS are the biggest building blocks of our observable universe; the second link in the universal chain of structures. They are huge. It takes thousands of large galaxies to form a supercluster like the local Laniakea Supercluster, a matryoshka doll that includes our Milky Way and Andromeda galaxy as a minute part of its mass.

GALAXIES that nestle as building blocks within these super clusters serve as the third link in the universal chain of mass structures, stacked within each other. Astronomers have long observed that it takes a far greater number of suns to build a galaxy than it takes to build a super cluster out of a few thousand galaxies.

SUNS, nestle as building blocks within galaxies. They represent the fourth link in the universal structural chain; the fourth stacking doll. Science tells us it takes an exponentially greater number of ‘elementary particles’ to build a sun than it takes of suns to build a small galaxy.

We are bound by old traditions, but are we unable to see what is staring us in the face? Why has nobody in our enlightened world observed the consistent pattern that stares back at us from the night sky.

And, down the rabbit hole we go, blind as bats, with a keen sense of reality.

Nothing but tradition tells us that the laws that govern universal chain structures must stop with so-called fundamental particles, whether we can see them or not, especially not after quantum science had to grudgingly accept that they are composite structures composed of 3 quarks (please stop laughing).

Neutrons, Protons and Electrons are the fifth link in the universal chain of mass structures. The pattern of the universal chain demands there be exponentially more building blocks inside a proton than within our sun that contains 10⁵⁷ of these subatomic particles.

MATTRONS (according to the Primal Code), as the sixth link. They are the first composite structure in the universal chain, and they serve as the building blocks of subatomic particles.

THE PRIMAL ATOM is the seventh and last link in the universal chain. The primal atom is the only link in the chain that is not composite. It is a corporeal mass digit built of nothing but itself.

There is nothing in our universe but primal atoms.

At the bottom of my rabbit hole, we can take the opportunity to reverse the chain and count the primal atom as the first link in the chain of universal mass structures.

Let us take a look at the vast numbers of primal atoms within the first two composite stacking dolls; the Mattron and the Proton, but first we must take another look at the sky where the truth is hiding in plain view.

Can you kids see any pattern to this chain of structural links?

Science has counted the building units within each link in the observable Cosmic Model. The divergence of building block numbers within each stacking doll is not by a whisker relative to the composite structure below it or above it. The difference is profound and systematic. In lieu of available local mass, structural masses in the universal chain can of course vary within a narrow band.

Although this general divergence continues systematically down the chain of super clusters, galaxies, and suns, science has through the ages accepted this great divergence as no more than an anecdotal detail.

You can use a simple (m²)² equation to quantify the rough correlation of building blocks within each of the stacking doll in the universal chain, up and down, link after link. (When you kids multiply powers, just add them up as 14 plus 14 is 28 and (28)² is 56 etc.).

The estimated mass of our Laniakea Supercluster is 10¹⁷ solar masses. You can also count then as roughly 3200 heavy galaxies that serve as the superclusters benchmark building blocks.

Use the (m²)² correlation by squaring the 3200 galactic number and squaring the result. This tells you that the next lower Matryoshka doll, that would be a massive galaxy, should hold 10¹⁴ suns, which indeed is the correct number of suns.

Is this a pattern or a fluke?

Feeding 10¹⁴ suns to (m²)² tells us that the next lower stacking doll, the next link in the universal chain, which is the average sun, should be built of 10⁵⁶ internal entities. In fact, the average universal sun is built of 10⁵⁶ “fundamental”particles.

Now we have reached down to so-called fundamental particles. I am old enough to recall the proclamation nailed to the Church door that subatomic particles are indivisible. With physics on the ropes when Hadron properties could not be tamed in the 1960’, quantum science demanded some way to fine-tune its math and the ‘particle’ conclave grudgingly accepted Hadrons to be composite structures.

The consensus of allowing three quarks was not built on cosmic models. Its aim was not to rock the boat (the Universe was not impressed). Three quarks were the minimum needed to deal mathematically with the unruly Hadron behavior. A new proclamation was nailed to the Church door. Hadrons are composite structures built of three fundamental entities. Savor the epiphany of an expedient decision.

As it turned out, the three quarks could not save the day. I am not being fair, but mathematicians, jumping like cows turned to pasture, realized that nobody could argue against any outrageous additional assumption while it remained hidden behind the quantum wall.

If a string of assumptions dovetailed with experimental outcome, all was fine. This is where quantum math lost the battle for the soul of physics. From that point, the end result justified the means.

The first stappling solutions were simple adjustments to give the quarks a growing number of mathematical properties, but the exhilaration of new degree of freedom was soon to escalate into infinite numbers of virtual entities and untold armies of quark-antiquark pairs. All to hold the fort to the new gospel of three quarks.

We who pursue the real universe, follow the universal chain of corporeal structures. You kids can take the 10⁵⁷ subatomic particles of Our Sun and feed that number of mattron building blocks into (m²)². This brings the number of mattron building blocks within a single proton to 10²²⁸.

There is no question that a number with 228 zeros is a big enough to rattle anybody, although I must point out that we already accept 57 zeros in the number of building blocks within Our Sun. Surely, a big number is not a scientific reason to shy away from this clear universal pattern.

And the rabbit hole goes deeper. The mattron is the first composite structure in the universal chain. Feeding 10²²⁸ to (m²)², the mattron must condense into a collapsing cloud of 10⁹¹² primal atoms, which rather dramatically trumps three quarks.

I ask you to use primal relativity to adjust your conceptual image of these many and apparently miniscule composite structures. You kids are seriously underestimating your own gargantuan vastness. Having done that, allow your mind’s eye to adjust to all composite building entities and the more outrageously empty volumes that hold them. This applies to all our Matryoshka dolls. Relativity is imperative.